In a legal tussle that has captivated Hollywood’s attention, 2019 saw the onset of a legal standoff between iconic actor Robert De Niro and his former assistant, Graham Chase Robinson. Their dispute highlights the intricacies of workplace dynamics, gender discrimination claims, and the potential implications of such high-profile cases on New York’s discrimination laws.

De Niro initiated legal action against Robinson, alleging professional misconduct, which included binge-watching television shows during work hours and misappropriating company frequent-flyer miles. Robinson, in a counter-move two months later, filed her lawsuit accusing De Niro of gender discrimination, retaliation, and fostering a hostile work environment. This legal counter was significant, especially against the rising #MeToo movement, spotlighting workplace harassment and gender discrimination.

Robinson, employed from 2008 to 2019 by De Niro’s Canal Productions, ascended the corporate ladder from an executive assistant to vice president of production and finance. Despite her high-ranking titles, Robinson alleges that she was frequently tasked with domestic chores, including housekeeping duties for De Niro’s residence. This blurred professional boundary introduced Tiffany Chen, De Niro’s girlfriend, into the fray, further complicating the narrative.

Gender Discrimination:

Chen’s involvement is particularly pivotal. Her interactions and exchanges with Robinson, combined with her and De Niro’s speculations about Robinson’s alleged romantic feelings for the actor, have been instrumental in bolstering Robinson’s gender discrimination claims. U.S. District Judge Lewis Liman underscored this by pointing out that a jury could perceive Chen’s actions and comments as gender-motivated, especially since she wasn’t a Canal employee but could have acted as an “agent” of the company.

Legal Implications and the Spotlight on New York Discrimination Laws:

New York’s discrimination laws have been framed to ensure that employees are treated fairly, without prejudice, based on gender, race, religion, or other protected attributes. This case underscores the importance of these laws, mainly when potential violations occur in high-profile settings.

Retaliation and Counterclaims:

A significant aspect of this case is the retaliation claim. After Robinson expressed her intent to resign, she alleged that De Niro threatened her with a negative recommendation. After her resignation, De Niro’s legal team initiated a review of her professional conduct, further escalating the legal tension. The back-and-forth legal claims and counterclaims, including allegations of theft and fiduciary breaches, underscore the case’s complexity.

What will happen?

This legal battle is not just a Hollywood spectacle but a cautionary tale and learning opportunity for employers and employees alike. It underscores the importance of clear workplace boundaries, the potential pitfalls of blurring professional and personal lines, and the imperative to uphold and respect employee rights. As the trial progresses, with De Niro and Chen expected to testify, it will be enlightening to see how New York’s federal court navigates these intricate issues, setting precedents for future cases.

Contact an Experienced Employment Attorney:

For those who have been the target of discrimination at work, working with a qualified and knowledgeable attorney is often the best action for effectively addressing these issues. At Risman & Risman, we offer expert legal help for those facing discrimination in the workplace. Our team can provide you with specialized legal services for your issues. Call us today at 212-233-6400 to schedule a free initial consultation with our team.

Scroll to Top